LITERASI SPASIAL SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI PERBEDAAN GAYA BELAJAR

Indah Prasetya Ningsih(1*), Mega Teguh Budiarto(2), Siti Khabibah(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Surabaya
(2) Universitas Negeri Surabaya
(3) Universitas Negeri Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Abstrak

Tujuan pada penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan profil literasi spasial siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal geometri berdasarkan tinjauan perbedaan gaya belajar. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Subjek penelitian ini adalah tiga siswa kelas VIII yang berkemampuan matematika tinggi dengan masing-masing gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinestetik. Instrumen pendukung pada penelitian ini adalah 1) angket gaya belajar; 2) tes kemampuan matematika; 3) tugas geometri; dan 4) pedoman wawancara. Hasil Penelitian ini adalah subjek dengan gaya belajar visual tergolong baik dalam domain visualisasi spasial dan penalaran spasial, tetapi lemah dalam komunikasi spasial. Subjek dengan gaya belajar auditori tergolong baik dalam visualisasi dan komunikasi spasial tetapi lemah pada penalaran spasial. Serta subjek gaya belajar kinestetik tergolong baik dalam komunikasi spasial tetapi lemah pada penalaran spasial.

 

Kata kunci: gaya belajar; literasi spasial; geometri.

 

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the profile of students spatial literacy in solving geometry problems based on a review of differences in learning styles. The type of research used is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The subjects of this study were three grade VIII students who had high mathematical abilities with their respective visual learning styles, auditory learning styles, and kinesthetic learning styles. The supporting instruments in this study were 1) a learning style questionnaire; 2) math ability test; 3) geometry task; and 4) interview guide. The results of this study are subjects with visual learning styles classified as good in the domain of spatial visualization and spatial reasoning, but weak in spatial communication. Subjects with auditory learning style are good in visualization and spatial communication but weak in spatial reasoning. And the subject of kinesthetic learning styles is good in spatial communication but weak in spatial reasoning.

 

Keywords: learning style; spatial literacy; geometry


Keywords


gaya belajar; literasi spasial; geometri.

References


Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., & Yunansah, H. (2017). Pembelajaran Literasi Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membaca, dan Menulis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Alfaruqi, A. I., & Lutfianto, M. (2018). Perbandingan Kemampuan Spasial Siswa Sma Pada Materi Geometri Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan (Vol. 1, pp. 13-17).

Bednarz, S. W., & Kemp, K. (2011). Understanding and nurturing spatial literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 18-23. Diakses dari www.sciencedirect.com.

Budiarto, M. T., & Artiono, R. (2019). Geometri Dan Permasalahan Dalam Pembelajarannya (Suatu Penelitian Meta Analisis). JUMADIKA: Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 9-18.

De Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. In B. L. Madison, & L. A. Steen (Eds.), Quantitative literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges (pp. 75-89). Princeton, NJ: The National Council on Education and the Disciplines.

De Lange, J. (2006). Mathematical literacy for living from OECD-PISA perspective.

DePorter, B., Reardon, M., & Singer-Nourie, S. (2014). Quantum teaching: mempraktikkan quantum learning di ruang-ruang kelas. Bandung: Kaifa.

Fitri, N. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Spasial Siswa SMA dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh).

Harianti, F. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Guided Discovery Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Materi Operasi Aljabar Kelas VII SMP. MUST: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 3(1), 82–91.

Hidayat, K. N. (2017). The Analisis Proses Berfikir Spasial Siswa Pada Materi Geometri Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. Prosiding SI MaNIs (Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika dan Nilai-Nilai Islami) (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 385-394)

Jarvis, C. H. (2011). Spatial literacy and the postgraduate GIS curriculum. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 294-299.

Lane, D., Lynch, R., & McGarr, O. (2019). Problematizing spatial literacy within the school curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), 685-700.

Moore-Russo, D., Viglietti, J. M., Chiu, M. M., & Bateman, S. M. (2013). Teachers' spatial literacy as visualization, reasoning, and communication. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 97-109.

Mulligan, J. (2015). Looking within and beyond the geometry curriculum: connecting spatial reasoning to mathematics learning. ZDM, 47(3), 511-517.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Nja, C. O., Umali, C. U. B., Asuquo, E. E., & Orim, R. E. (2019). The influence of learning styles on academic performance among science education undergraduates at the University of Calabar. Educational Research and Review, 14(17), 618-624.

OECD (2016), Equations and Inequalities: Making Mathematics Accessible to All, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264258495-en.

OECD (2019), PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework, PISA,

OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.

Subaidah, S., Valentino, E., & Wijayanti, E. (2017). Analisis Literasi Matematika Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Soal Matematika Pisa Konten Ruang Dan Bentuk. Buana Matematika: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 7-12.

Wickramasinghe, S., & Hettiarachchi, S. (2017). Relationship among students’ learning styles, assessment methods and students’ performances.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3650

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.