Eksperimentasi Pembelajaran RME dengan Problem Solving dan RME dengan Problem Posing Ditinjau dari Kreativitas Siswa

Satrio Wicaksono Sudarman(1*),

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student creativity. The learning model compared were RME with problem solving, RME with problem posing on conventional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the students of Junior High School in Surakarta city on academic year 2012/2013. The samples of this research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consisted of 269 students who were divided into 90 students in the first experiment class, 90 students in the second experiment class, and 89 students in the control class. The result of research showed that: (1) RME with problem solving provided better learning achievement than RME with problem posing and the conventional model. The RME learning model with problem posing provided better learning achievement than conventional one, (2) the students having high creativity had better learning achievement than those having medium and low creativity. The students having medium creativity had better learning achievement than did those having low creativity, (3) students taught by using RME with problem solving having high creativity level had better learning achievement than those having medium and low creativity level and students having medium creativity level had learning achievement as good as the low creativity level. Students taught by using RME with problem posing and conventional model had equal learning achievement in each level of creativity, and (4) students having high creativity level taught by using RME with problem solving had better learning achievement than those taught by using RME with problem posing and conventional model. Students having high creativity taught by using RME with problem posing and conventional model had equally good learning achievement. Students having medium and low creativity level had equal learning achievement in each learning model.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Budiyono. 2009. Statistika Dasar untuk Penelitian Edisi ke-2. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Font, V. & Malaspina, U. 2010. The role of intuition in the solving of optimization problems. Netherlands Journal of Education Study Mathematics. 27 (2): 107-130. Diunduh dari http://www.ejmste.com pada 24 Februari 2013 pukul 08.00 WIB.

Marpaung. 2001. Makalah Penyajian Bahan Ajar dan Contoh PMRI. Disajikan pada seminar di puskur Depdiknas 19 Agustus 2003.

Lee, K. H. dan Bharath, S. 2010. Conjecturing via reconceived classical analogy. Columbia. Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics.76 (2): 123-140. Diunduh dari http://www.springerlink.com/content pada 17 Februari 2012 pukul 22.00 WIB.

Nurmaningsih. 2012. Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving dan Problem Posing Berbantuan Alat Peraga pada Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus Ditinjau dari Kreativitas Belajar Siswa SMP se-Kota Pontianak. Tesis S2. Tidak dipublikasikan. Program Pascasarjana UNS. Surakarta.

Ozdemir, U. & Uzel, D. 2011. The effect of realistic mathematics education on student achievemented student opinions towards instruction. Journal of Education, 40: 332-343. Diunduh darihttp://www.ejmste.com pada 23 Februari 2013 pukul 07.00 WIB.

Peker, M. 2008. Pre-service elementary school teachers ’learning styles and attitude towards mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4 (1): 21-26. Diunduh dari http://www.ejmste.com pada 22 Desember 2012 pukul 13.00 WIB.

Riawan Yudi Purwoko. 2011. Eksperimentasi Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik dengan Metode Peneluam Ditinjau dari Kreativitas Belajar Matematika Siswa. Tesis S2. Tidak dipublikasikan. Program Pascasarjana UNS. Surakarta.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v3i2.33

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.