Awal Nur Kholifatur Rosyidah(1), Umar Umar(2), Iva Nurmawanti(3), Vivi Rachmatul Hidayati(4*), Mohammad Archi Maulyda(5),

(1) Universitas Mataram
(2) Universitas Mataram
(3) Universitas Mataram
(4) Universitas Mataram
(5) Universitas Mataram
(*) Corresponding Author


Reasoning and Proof ability are one of the five standards in NCTM. Its implementation in learning can be transformed into problem-based learning (PBL). The purpose of this study is to provide a description related to the internalization of Reasoning and Proof standards in the mathematics learning process in elementary schools. The type of research used is qualitative with descriptive analysis. The research subjects were 24 elementary school teachers in Cluster IV Mataram City. The data collection process was carried out by a survey method that was conducted online using the Google form platform. To strengthen the results of the questionnaire, interviews were also conducted via WhatsApp phone to each research subject. The results of the research showed that 45.8% (11 subjects) had never heard of the terms reasoning and proof, while 54.2% (13 subjects) had never heard of the terms reasoning and proof. The deepening of the results of this study found that the feasibility of Reasoning and Proof standards in learning was still not optimal. In addition, several interesting facts were found related to the method of proof that teachers often use, namely giving examples that are close to students (relate).


Elementary School Teachers, NCTM, Problem Based Learning, Reasoning and Proof.

Full Text:



Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 3(3), 67–78.

Bikić, N., Maričić, S. M., & Pikula, M. (2016). The effects of differentiation of content in problem-solving in learning geometry in secondary school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 15–23.

Boud, D., & Feletti, G. I. (2013). The challenge of problem-based learning. In The Challenge of Problem-based Learning (1st ed.). Berrett Koehler Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Diani, R., Yuberti, Y., & Syarlisjiswan, M. R. (2018). Web-Enhanced Course Based on Problem-Based Learning (PBL): Development of Interactive Learning Media for Basic Physics II. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(1), 105.

Fahle, M. (2005). Perceptual learning: Specificity versus generalization. In Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

Faradillah, A. (2018). Analysis of Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers in Solving Algebra Problem Based on Reflective and Impulsive Cognitive Style. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 8(2).

Filipenko, M., & Naslund, J. A. (2015). Problem-based learning in teacher education. In Problem-Based Learning in Teacher Education. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Hafid, H. A. (2011). Sumber dan Media Pembelajaran. Jurnal Sulesana, 1(3), 56–78.

Hekimoglu, S., & Sloan, M. (2015). A Compendium of Views on the NCTM Standards. Mathematics Educator, 15(1), 35–43.

Hidayati, A., & Widodo, S. (2015). Proses Penalaran Matematis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika pada Materi Pokok Dimensi Tiga Berdasarkan Kemampuan Siswa di SMA Negeri 5 Kediri. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 7(3), 45–68.

Hunt, T., Carper, J., Lasley, T., Raisch, C., & Dickey, E. M. (2013). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. In Encyclopedia of Educational Reform and Dissent. University of Illinois.

Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35(4), 235–267.

Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., & Xin, Y. P. (2010). An Evaluation of the Intended and Implemented Curricula’s Adherence to the NCTM Standards on the Mathematics Achievement of Third Grade Students: A Case Study. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 7(3), 208–231.

King, A. (2014). Mathematical Explorations: Freshwater Scarcity A Proportional Representation. NCTM, 20(3), 152–157.

Ko, Y. Y., & Knuth, E. J. (2013). Validating proofs and counterexamples across content domains: Practices of importance for mathematics majors. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(2), 563–678.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition (2nd ed.). Berrett Koehler Inc.

Komatsu, K. (2016). A framework for proofs and refutations in school mathematics: Increasing content by deductive guessing. Educational Studies in Mathematics.

Kovach, M., & Montgomery, H. (2010). What kind of learning ? For what purpose ? Reflections on a critical adult education approach to online Social Work and Education courses serving Indigenous distance learners. Critical Social Work, 11(May), 27–61.

Lo, J. J., Grant, T. J., & Flowers, J. (2008). Challenges in deepening prospective teachers’ understanding of multiplication through justification. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(3), 556–578.

Manz, E. (2015). Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent From Scientific Activity. Review of Educational Research, 14(4), 413–422.

Maulyda, M. A. (2020). Paradigma Pembelajaran Matematika berbasis NCTM (1st ed., Issue January). CV. IRDH Malang.

McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K-12 teachers. Science Education, 12(3), 45–57.

Metz, M. L. (2010). Using GAISE and NCTM standards as frameworks for teaching probability and statistics to pre-service elementary and middle school mathematics teachers. Journal of Statistics Education, 6(4), 143–157.

Mizumoto, T., Ouchi, H., Isobe, Y., Reisert, P., Nagata, R., Sekine, S., & Inui, K. (2019). Analytic Score Prediction and Justification Identification in Automated Short Answer Scoring. Procedia Computer Science.

Navarro, D. J., Newell, B. R., & Schulze, C. (2016). Learning and choosing in an uncertain world: An investigation of the explore-exploit dilemma in static and dynamic environments. Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 14–26.

NCTM. (2009). Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making. In The Mathematics Teacher (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Okubo, Y., Ishiguro, N., Suganuma, T., Nishikawa, T., Takubo, T., Kojimahara, N., Yago, R., Nunoda, S., Sugihara, S., & Yoshioka, T. (2012). Team-based learning, a learning strategy for clinical reasoning, in students with problem-based learning tutorial experiences. Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 12(5), 67–87.

Ruggiero, D., & Mong, C. J. (2015). The teacher technology integration experience: Practice and reflection in the classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 12(4), 314–325.

Sampson, V., & Blanchard, M. R. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(3), 55–78.

Simon, M. A. (2020). Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Constructivist Perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(4), 887–896.

Tall, D. (2014). Making Sense of Mathematical Reasoning and Proof (2nd ed.). Fakulti Pendidikan UKM.

The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4(4), 85–98.

Toom, A., Husu, J., & Patrikainen, S. (2015). Student teachers’ patterns of reflection in the context of teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 7(3), 123–134.

Wang, Z., & Wang, Z. (2018). Error Analysis of 8th Graders’ Reasoning and Proof of Congruent Triangles in China. In Journal of Mathematics Education (Vol. 11, Issue 2).

Zhao, L., Peng, X., Chen, Y., Kapadia, M., & Metaxas, D. N. (2020). Knowledge As Priors: Cross-Modal Knowledge Generalization for Datasets Without Superior Knowledge. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 677.



  • There are currently no refbacks.