POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE UNDERSTANDING MONITORING CALON GURU DALAM PENYUSUNAN SOAL CERITA PECAHAN

Dedi Kusnadi, Irianto Aras, A.Wilda Indra Nanna, Enditiyas Pratiwi

Abstract


Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan self-explanation mahasiswa terhadap penyusunan soal cerita materi pecahan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif yang menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data dengan memberikan tes yang ditindaklanjuti dengan wawancara untuk menggali lebih dalam tentang pemahaman keputusan yang diambil. Hasil yang diperoleh dalam penelitian ini, yaitu: (1) pada soal pertama, partisipan memunculkan perbedaan pada kategori positive dan negative understanding monitoring; (2) pada soal kedua, perbedaan yang muncul pada kategori elaboration of problem. Temuan dalam penelitian ini, yaitu jika partisipan melibatkan pemahaman maka keputusan yang diambil memunculkan positive understanding monitoring dan sebaliknya jika tidak melibatkan pemahaman maka keputusan yang diambil memunculkan negative understanding monitoring. Namun, terdapat partisipan yang hanya mengandalkan pengalaman dalam membuat soal dan berakhir dengan positive understanding monitoring.

 


Abstract

The purpose of this study to describe the self-explanation of the pre-service teachers on how they draft the fraction material story words. This research is qualitative. The data collected in this study employs tests and interviews. The reason why conducting interviews is to acquire data deeply in understanding the decisions taken. Based on the result of analyzing the data,  it shows that: (1) in the first question, participants showed differences in the positive and negative understanding in monitoring categories; (2) in the second question, the differences that appear in the elaboration of problem category. The finding in this study shows if the participants involve understanding, the decisions taken will give rise to positive understanding monitoring. Moreover, if it does not involve understanding, the decisions taken will give rise to negative understanding monitoring. However, some participants only rely on their experiences in making questions and finish it with positive understanding monitoring.


Keywords


menyusun; pecahan; penjelasan diri; soal cerita; creating; fraction; self-explanation

References


Baars, M., Leopold, C., & Paas, F. (2018). Self-explaining steps in problem-solving tasks to improve self-regulation in secondary education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(4), 578–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000223

Bisra, K., Liu, Q., Nesbit, J. C., Salimi, F., & Winne, P. H. (2018). Inducing Self-Explanation: a Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9434-x

Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In Advances in instructional psychology.

DeCaro, M. S., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). Exploring mathematics problems prepares children to learn from instruction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(4), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.009

Dixon, J. K., Andreasen, J. B., Avila, C. L., Bawatneh, Z., Deichert, D. L., Howse, T. D., & Turner, M. S. (2014). Redefining the Whole: Common Errors in Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Self-Authored Word Problems for Fraction Subtraction. Investigations in Mathematics Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2014.11790336

Durkin, K. (2011). The self-explanation effect when learning mathematics: a meta-analysis. Conference on Building and Educatioan Science: Investigating Mechanisms.

Fuchs, L. S., Malone, A. S., Schumacher, R. F., Namkung, J., Hamlett, C. L., Jordan, N. C., Siegler, R. S., Gersten, R., & Changas, P. (2016). Supported self-explaining during fraction intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000073

Fuchs, L. S., Malone, A. S., Schumacher, R. F., Namkung, J., & Wang, A. (2015). Action, interaction, intervention. Action, Interaction, Intervention, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-0239-7

Hadi, A. La, & Kadir. (2017). Kemampuan Calon Guru dalam Mengajukan Masalah Contextual Word Problems Tentang Pengurangan Pecahan. April, 178–188.

Heitzmann, N., Fischer, F., & Fischer, M. R. (2018). Worked examples with errors: when self-explanation prompts hinder learning of teachers diagnostic competences on problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 46(2), 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9432-2

Işik, C., & Kar, T. (2012). An error analysis in division problems in fractions posed by pre-service elementary mathematics teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice.

Killingsworth, S. S., Clark, D. B., & Adams, D. M. (2015). Self-Explanation and Explanatory Feedback in Games: Individual Differences, Gameplay, and Learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(3), 162. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.15600

Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012). The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x

Mpofu, S., & Pournara, C. (2018). Learner Participation in the Functions Discourse: A Focus on Asymptotes of the Hyperbola. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1409170

Nanna, A. W. I., & Pratiwi, E. (2020). Students ’ Cognitive Barrier in Problem Solving : Picture -based Problem-solving. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.

Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of fractions. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1080–1110. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208320851

Nokes-Malach, T. J., VanLehn, K., Belenky, D. M., Lichtenstein, M., & Cox, G. (2013). Coordinating principles and examples through analogy and self-explanation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1237–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0164-z

Pratiwi, E., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, S., Muksar, M., & Subanji, S. (2019a). Characteristics of students’ cognitive conflict in solving a problem based on information processing theory. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.2.6

Pratiwi, E., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, S., Muksar, M., & Subanji, S. (2019b). Characteristics of students’ cognitive conflict in solving a problem based on information processing theory. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(2), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.2.6

Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2101_1

Rittle-johnson, B. (2004). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Promoting Flexible Problem Solving : The Effects of Direct Instruction and Self-Explaining.

Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017). Developing Mathematics Knowledge. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12229

Rittle-Johnson, B., Loehr, A. M., & Durkin, K. (2017). Promoting self-explanation to improve mathematics learning: A meta-analysis and instructional design principles. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(4), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0834-z

Safriani, W., Munzir, S., Duskri, M., & Maulidi, I. (2019). Analysis of Students’ Errors on the Fraction Calculation Operations Problem. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(02), 307–318.

Shin, M., & Bryant, D. P. (2017). Improving the Fraction Word Problem Solving of Students With Mathematics Learning Disabilities: Interactive Computer Application. Remedial and Special Education, 38(2), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516669052

Shulman, L. S. (2019). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Profesorado. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v23i3.11230

Tajika, H., Nakatsu, N., Nozaki, H., Neumann, E., & Maruno, S. (2007). Effects of self-explanation as a metacognitive strategy for solving mathematical word problems 1. Japanese Psychological Research, 49(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2007.00349.x

Tichá, M., & Hošpesová, A. (2013). Developing teachers’ subject didactic competence through problem posing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9455-1

Wang, Z., & Adesope, O. (2017). Do focused self-explanation prompts overcome seductive details? A multimedia study. Educational Technology and Society, 20(4), 47–57.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.3175

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexing by: