PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR GEOMETRI BERBASIS SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) UNTUK MENDUKUNG KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL
(1) Universitas Islam Majaoahit
(2) Universitas Islam Majapahit
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengembangkan bahan ajar geometri berbasis STEM untuk mahasiswa S1 jurusan pendidikan matematika. Terdapat tiga langkah utama yaitu Fase Pendahuluan, yaitu menganalisis masalah yang dihadapi mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran mata kuliah geometri. Pada tahap ini akan diperoleh permasalahan pokok yang dihadapi dan kebutuhan siswa dalam pembelajaran geometri. Fase Pengembangan merupakan tahap kedua dimana mengembangkan prototipe atau desain awal bahan ajar geometri berbasis materi STEM. Tahap terakhir yaitu Fase Penilaian atau tahap validasi dimana harus menganalisis apakah kualitas produk bahan ajar yang telah disiapkan memenuhi kriteria. Berdasarkan hasil analisis dapat disimpulkan bahwa bahan ajar geometri berbasis STEM layak digunakan dan efektif digunakan dalam pembelajaran untuk mendukung kemampuan spasial mahasiswa. Namun demi tercapainya hasil yang lebih memuaskan maka disarankan untuk membiasakan mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis STEM.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Çevik, M. (2018). Investigating STEM Semantics and Perceptions of Engineer Candidates and Pre-Service Teachers: A Mixed Method Study. International Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 17.
DES. (2017). STEM Education Policy Statement 2017-2026. Department of Education and Skills. https://www.gov.ie/en/policy-information/4d40d5-stem-education-policy/
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
Goddijn, A., Kindt, M., & Wolfgang, R. (2014). Geometry with Applications and Proofs Advanced Geometry for Senior High School, Student Text and Background Information. Sense Publisher.
Hannafin, R. D., Truxaw, M. P., Vermillion, J. R., & Liu, Y. (2008). Effects of Spatial Ability and Instructional Program on Geometry Achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(3), 148–156. JSTOR.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Tatus, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. National Academy of Engineering; National Research Council.
Karisan, D., Macalalag, A., & Johnson, J. (2019). The Effect of Methods Course on Pre- Service Teachers’ Awareness and Intentions of Teaching Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects. 15.
Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. 153, 152–169.
Noto, M. S., Priatna, N., & Dahlan, J. A. (2019). MATHEMATICAL PROOF: THE LEARNING OBSTACLES OF PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS ON TRANSFORMATION GEOMETRY. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5379.117-126
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. M. (2010). An introduction to educational design research: Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26, 2007. http://www.slo.nl/downloads/2009/Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf/download
Rabab’h, B., & Veloo, A. (2015). Spatial Visualization as Mediating between Mathematics Learning Strategy and Mathematics Achievement among 8th Grade Students. International Education Studies, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n5p1
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M.,
Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde,
D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
Turgut, M. (2012). RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PRESERVICE PRIMARY MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ GENDER, ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND SPATIAL ABILITY. International Journal of Instruction, 16.
Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Newcombe, N. S., Filipowicz, A. T., & Chang, A. (2014). Deconstructing building blocks: Preschoolers’ spatial assembly performance relates to early mathematical skills. Child Development, 85(3), 1062–1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12165
Weckbacher, L. M., & Okamoto, Y. (2018). Predictability of Visual Processes on Performance in Geometry. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 25. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n6p25
Williams, C. B., Gero, J., Lee, Y., & Paretti, M. (2010). Exploring Spatial Reasoning Ability and Design Cognition in Undergraduate Engineering Students. Volume 6: 15th Design for Manufacturing and the Lifecycle Conference; 7th Symposium on International Design and Design Education, 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2010-28925
Williams, M. E., Graves, L. V., DeJesus, S. Y., Holden, H. M., DeFord, N. E., & Gilbert, P. E. (2019). Spatial memory ability during middle age may depend on level of spatial similarity. Learning & Memory, 26(1), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.048280.118
Yeh, A., & Chandra, V. (2015). Mathematics, Programming, and STEM. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 8.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.3141
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.