PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS METACOGNITIVE BELIEFS AND THEIR EFFECT ON MATHEMATICS ANXIETY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i3.2793Keywords:
Mathematics anxiety, metacognitive beliefs, pre-service teachersAbstract
The present study aimed to identify the effects of metacognitive beliefs on mathematics anxiety encompassed by pre-service mathematics teachers’. The intervention role of factors such as positive beliefs was also examined. For this purpose, a total of sixty college students from the mathematics education program of one of the public universities in Indonesia were investigated through cross-sectional surveys. The data of the research were collected through a students’ self-report measure of metacognitive beliefs and mathematics anxiety. The results reveal that although there is no gender difference in metacognitive beliefs, female students are more anxious in mathematics than male students. There are no year levels of difference in metacognitive beliefs and mathematics anxiety. The result shows that metacognitive beliefs have negatively correlated with math anxiety. This study concludes that developing metacognitive beliefs helps pre-service mathematics teachers to effectively overcome mathematics anxiety. Also, enhancing cognitive confidence and controlling negative beliefs about the uncontrollability of thoughts and danger has implications as a treatment to reduce mathematics anxiety.References
Artemenko, C., Daroczy, G., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Neural correlates of math anxiety–an overview and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1333.
Bahrami, F., & Yousefi, N. (2011). Females are more anxious than males: A metacognitive perspective. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 5(2), 83–90.
Castelnuovo, G., Simons, M., Gawe¸da, Å., Gawe¸da, G., Reinholdt-Dunne, M. L., Blicher, A., & Wells, A. (2019). Modeling the Relationships Between Metacognitive Beliefs, Attention Control and Symptoms in Children With and Without Anxiety Disorders: A Test of the S-REF Model. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01205
Cipora, K., Szczygiel, M., Willmes, K., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Math anxiety assessment with the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale: Applicability and usefulness: Insights from the polish adaptation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(NOV), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01833
Devine, A., Fawcett, K., Szucs, D., & Dowker, A. (2012). Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-33
Gkika, S., Wittkowski, A., & Wells, A. (2018). Social cognition and metacognition in social anxiety: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 25(1), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2127
Gresham, G. (2018). Preservice to inservice: does mathematics anxiety change with teaching experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702580
Hill, F., Mammarella, I. C., Devine, A., Caviola, S., Passolunghi, M. C., & Szucs, D. (2016). Maths anxiety in primary and secondary school students: Gender differences, developmental changes and anxiety specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 48(2015), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.006
Huntley, C. D., Young, B., Smith, C. T., Jha, V., & Fisher, P. L. (2020). Assessing metacognitive beliefs in test anxiety: Psychometric properties of the metacognitions questionnaire, 30 (MCQ-30) among university students. Current Psychology, 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00662-y
Jansen, B. R. J., Schmitz, E. A., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2016). Affective and motivational factors mediate the relation between math skills and use of math in everyday life. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(APR), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00513
Lenzo, V., Ellen, M., Tripodi, F., & Quattropani, M. C. (2016). Gender Differences in Anxiety , Depression and Metacognition. In Z. Bekirogullari, M. Y. Minas, & R. X. Thambusamy (Eds.), The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS (pp. 1–16). Retrieved from http://www.futureacademy.org.uk/files/images/upload/1_4381_fullText_1_27.pdf
Luttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S141421
Melli, G., Bailey, R., Carraresi, C., & Poli, A. (2018). Metacognitive beliefs as a predictor of health anxiety in a self-reporting Italian clinical sample. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 25(2), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2159
Ostefjells, T., Lystad, J. U., Berg, A. O., Hagen, R., Loewy, R., Sandvik, L., & Rossberg, J. I. (2017). Metacognitive beliefs mediate the effect of emotional abuse on depressive and psychotic symptoms in severe mental disorders. Psychological Medicine, 47(13), 2323–2333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717000848
Palmier-Claus, J. E., Dunn, G., Morrison, A. P., & Lewis, S. W. (2011). The role of metacognitive beliefs in stress sensitisation, self-esteem variability, and the generation of paranoia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 16(6), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2011.561583
Ramirez, G., Shaw, S. T., & Maloney, E. A. (2018). Math Anxiety: Past Research, Promising Interventions, and a New Interpretation Framework. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1447384
Sellers, R., GawÄ™da, Å., Wells, A., & Morrison, A. P. (2016). The role of unhelpful metacognitive beliefs in psychosis: Relationships with positive symptoms and negative affect. Psychiatry Research, 246(October), 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.029
Sellers, R., Varese, F., Wells, A., & Morrison, A. P. (2017). A meta-analysis of metacognitive beliefs as implicated in the self-regulatory executive function model in clinical psychosis. Schizophrenia Research, 179, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2016.09.032
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
Creative Commons License
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. AKSIOMA offers all authors of journal articles allows their research openly available, free access and time restrictions.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in AKSIOMA in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of AKSIOMA are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, AKSIOMA as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
.png)
.png)
