PENGEMBANGAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIS MELALUI MODEL PJBL DENGAN PENDEKATAN REALISTIC SAINTIFIC DAN PENGUKURAN BERBASIS PISA

Citra Utami(1*), Resy Nirawati(2),

(1) STKIP Singkawang
(2) STKIP Singkawang
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


The aim of this research is to gain the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of developing instructional sets of mathematics through PjBL learning with realistic saintific approach and PISA-based measurements and to describe students' mathematical literacy skills in terms of KAM aspects and PISA measurement process. The development research using modified Plomp model. The tools developed include RPP, LAS, and TKLMBP. Data processed by -test, the proportion of -test, and gain test. The results showed: (1) The instructional sets PjBL model with realistic scientific approaches and PISA-based measurements to develop students' mathematical literacy skills is validity, practicality, and effectiveness; (2) The ability of students' mathematical literacy to based on the KAM aspects obtained in the three KAM groups is statistically significantly increased; and (3) students' mathematical literacy skills to based on aspects of PISA measurement, most students can solve problems that are in accordance with aspects of PISA measurement.


Keywords


Mathematical Literacy; PISA; PjBL; realistic scientific; LAS

References


Ahmad dan Jazuli, A. 2009. Jigsaw Type of Cooperative Learning As A Means of Improving High School-Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability. International Journal for Educational Studies. 1 (2): 207-218.

Arikunto, S. 2012. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Chang, M. C., dkk . 2014. Teacher Reform in Indonesia: The Role of Politics and Evidence in Policy Making. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Dini, N., E. 2015. LITERASI MATEMATIS DAN KECEMASAN MATEMATIKA SISWA SMA DALAM IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROJECT-BASED LEARNING Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia repository.upi.edu

Giilbahar, Y., & Tinmaz, H. 2006. Implementing Project-Based Learning and E-Portofolio Assesment In an Undergraduate Course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38 (3): 309-327.

Hidayah, I dan Sugiarto. 2006. Workshop Pendidikan Matematika 2. Semarang.http://downloads.ziddu.com/downloadfile/17234331/Newbiexposeskripsi.rar.htm

Husna, N., Mariyam, M., & Maudi, N. (2016). Implementasi Model Project Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 1(1), 39-43.

Indah, N., dkk. 2016. Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Based Learning di Kelas VII SMP Negeri 5 Pallangga Kabupaten Gowa. Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran. 4 (2), 205 – 209.

Kemendikbud.2013b. Permendikbud No. 65 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan

Khotimah, N., Utami, C., & Prihatiningtyas, N. C. (2018). Penerapan Model Learning Cycle 7E Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII Pada Materi Prisma. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 3(1), 15-20.

Lestari, L.P. 2006.Keefektifan Pembelajaran dengan Penggunaan Alat Peraga dan Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dalam Pokok Bahasan Bangun Segiempat pada Siswa Kelas VII Semester 2 di SMP Muhammadiyah Margasari Kabupaten Tegal Tahun Pelajaran 2005/2006.Skripsi pada Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Universitas NegeriSemarang(Online0.80halaman.Tersedia:http://uap.unnes.ac.id/data/skripsi/abstrak/pdf/eefektifan pembelajaran berba 4101905034.pdf

Li, Y., Chen, X., & Kulm, G. 2009. Mathematics teachers’ practices and thinking in lesson plan development: a case of teaching fraction division. ZDM. 41 (6): 717-731.

Marina, Yusmin. E, Yani.A.T (2016). Proses Literasi Matematis Dikaji Dari Content Space And Shape Dalam Materi Geometri Di SMA.Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran .5 (11), 4 - 10

Nieveen, N. 1999. Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training, Chapter 10, Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V.

OECD. 2003. Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow – Further Results from PISA (2000).Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development & Unesco Institute forStatistics

OECD, 2012b.PISA 2012 Assesment and Analitytical Framework Mathematics Reading, Science, Problem Solving, and Financial Literacy. (online) (http://www.oecd.org)

OECD.2015. PISA 2015 Released Mathematics Items. www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Take%20the%20test%20e%20book.pdf

Patton, A. 2012.Work That Matters The Teacher’s Guide to Project Based Learnnig. The Paul Hamlyn Foundation.

Prastowo, A. 2014. Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif.Yogyakarta:Diva Press.

Puspendik. 2016. Daya Serap Ujian Nasional Penguasaan Matematika Siswa SMP di Provinsi Kalimantan Barat dan Kota Singkawang. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan.

Syahlan.2014. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran dan Penilaian Otentik Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Tipe Jigsaw untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA/MA.Tesis (tidak dipublikasikan). Medan: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan.

Thomas, J. W. 2000. A Review Of Research On Project-Based Learning. California: The Autodesk foundation.

Zakaria, E., Chung C. L., dan Daud, Y. 2010. The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Mathematics Achievement and Attitude towards Mathematics. Journal of social sciences. 6(2): 272-275




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v7i3.1543

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.