STUDI MIXED METHODS CAPAIAN NUMERASI SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH BERDASARKAN DOMAIN, LEVEL, DAN JENIS SOAL

Jose Bonatua Hasibuan(1*), Deni Darmawan(2), Suhendra Suhendra(3), Deni Kurniawan(4),

(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(4) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Kemampuan numerasi siswa sekolah menengah di Indonesia menunjukkan kesenjangan yang jelas antara penguasaan soal rutin dan kemampuan menalar, menafsirkan data, serta memahami konteks. Kondisi ini menuntut pemetaan yang lebih komprehensif untuk memahami variasi capaian numerasi berdasarkan domain, level kognitif, dan karakteristik asesmen. Penelitian ini bertujuan memetakan kompetensi numerasi siswa SMA dan SMK di Provinsi Riau serta mengidentifikasi faktor pembelajaran, strategi guru, dan karakteristik soal yang memengaruhi hasil tersebut. Metode yang digunakan adalah mixed methods dengan desain sekuensial eksplanatori, melibatkan tes kuantitatif pada 288 siswa dan wawancara mendalam dengan guru serta siswa dari dua sekolah berprestasi tinggi. Instrumen tes mencakup 30 soal numerasi yang merepresentasikan tiga domain (geometri & pengukuran, aljabar, data & ketidakpastian), tiga level kognitif (Knowing, Applying, Reasoning), dan enam jenis soal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pola capaian hierarkis yang menurun dari Knowing ke Reasoning dengan perbedaan signifikan antar domain dan jenis soal. Capaian terendah ditemukan pada domain data dan ketidakpastian serta soal uraian yang menuntut penalaran tingkat tinggi dan interpretasi teks panjang. Temuan kualitatif menegaskan bahwa kesulitan utama siswa berkaitan dengan beban kognitif saat membaca konteks, keterbatasan hubungan konseptual–prosedural, dan kurangnya pembelajaran berbasis situasi nyata. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa peningkatan numerasi memerlukan pendekatan pembelajaran yang mengintegrasikan literasi membaca, penalaran matematis, dan strategi pedagogis reflektif secara berkelanjutan.


Keywords


domain matematika; jenis soal; level kognitif; mixed methods; numerasi

References


Aydın, U., & Birgili, B. (2023). Assessing mathematical higher-order thinking skills: An analysis of Turkish university entrance examinations. Educational Assessment. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/296378

Baharuddin, B., & Burhan, B. (2025). Urban and rural teacher perspectives on Indonesian educational reform: Challenges and policy implications. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2497142. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2497142

Beatty, A., Berkhout, E., Bima, L., Pradhan, M., & Suryadarma, D. (2021). Schooling progress, learning reversal: Indonesia’s learning profiles between 2000 and 2014. International Journal of Educational Development, 85, 102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102436

Breuer, S., Scherndl, T., & Ortner, T. M. (2023). Effects of response format on achievement and aptitude assessment results: Multi-level random effects meta-analyses. Royal Society Open Science, 10(5), 220456. ttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220456

Coles, A. T., & Helme, R. (2022). Teaching for mastery in primary mathematics: A study of translating research into policy and practice. Review of Education, 10(1), e3326. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3326

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2017). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.

Ekayanti, I. G. A. P. W. (2024). Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education: Alternative Mathematics Learning Approach to Improve Fifth Grade Numeracy Literacy Skills. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v7i1.68943

Fauziah, A., & Pandra, V. (2024). Developing PISA-like Mathematics Tasks in Musi Rawas Regency Contexts using Lesson Study. Mathematics Education Journal, 17(3), 279–296.

Fernández, L. M., & Ortiz Galarza, M. (2023). Contextualizing the Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Framework for Teachers of Emergent Bilinguals. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1146797. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1146797

Geiger, V. (2024). A critical turn in numeracy education and practice. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1363566. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1363566

Herbert, S., Vale, C., White, P., & Bragg, L. A. (2022). Engagement with a formative assessment rubric: A case of mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Educational Research, 111, 101899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101899

Hidayah, I. R., Sa’dijah, C., Anwar, L., Yerizon, Y., & Arnawa, I. M. (2025). Empowering students’ numeracy skills: Mathematics teachers’ perceptions regarding the effectiveness and challenges of Indonesian national curriculum and the programs – A mixed method study. Infinity Journal, 14(1), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i1.p163-188

Hubbard, J. K., Potts, M. A., & Couch, B. A. (2017). How question types reveal student thinking: Multiple-true-false item formats capture critical differences in student reasoning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(3), ar41. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0339

Iyamuremye, E., & Burns, D. (2025). Concrete–Pictorial–Abstract instruction: Enhancing students’ learning motivation and achievement in mathematics. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2558303. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2558303

Jablonski, S., & Ludwig, M. (2023). Teaching and learning of geometry—A literature review on current developments in theory and practice. Education Sciences, 13(7), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070682

Jannah, M., Pesik, A., Kumesan, S., Ermita, & Rahim, N. (2024). Analysis of student errors in solving equations and inequalities problems in algebra and trigonometry based on Newman procedure. Journal of Education and Teaching Learning, 6(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.51178/jetl.v6i1.1616

Kangas, M., & Rasi, P. (2021). Phenomenon-based learning of multiliteracy in a Finnish upper secondary school. Media Practice and Education, 22(4), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2021.1977769

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Pengelompokan satuan pendidikan berdasarkan hasil Asesmen Nasional tahun 2021. Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan (Pusmendik). https://pusmendik.kemdikbud.go.id/pdf/file-136

Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., & Walker, A. E. (2018). Effectiveness of computer-based scaffolding in the context of problem-based learning for STEM education: Bayesian meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 397–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1

Klingbeil, K., Rösken, F., Barzel, B., Schacht, F., Stacey, K., Steinle, V., & Thurm, D. (2024). Validity of multiple-choice digital formative assessment for detecting misconceptions in mathematics. ZDM – Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01556-0

Kohar, A. W., Rahaju, E. B., & Rohim, A. (2022). Prospective teachers’ design of numeracy tasks using a physical distancing context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i2.pp191-210

Kurniawan, A. P., Budiarto, M. T., & Ekawati, R. (2022). Pengembangan soal numerasi berbasis konteks nilai budaya primbon Jawa. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 7(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2022.7.1.20-34

Listiawati, N., Sabon, S. S., Wibowo, S. W. A., Zulkardi, & Riyanto, B. S. (2023). Analysis of implementing Realistic Mathematics Education principles to enhance mathematics competence of slow learner students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp683-700

Mahmuti, A., Hamzić, D. K., & Thaqi, X. (2025). The impact of contextual teaching and learning on improving student achievement in economic mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(3), em0833. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16233

Marcq, K., Chalén Donayre, E. J., & Braeken, J. (2024). The role of item format in the PISA 2018 mathematics literacy assessment: A cross-country study. Studies in Educational Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101401

Maskos, K., Schulz, A., Oeksuez, S. S., & Rakoczy, K. (2025). Formative assessment in mathematics education: A systematic review. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 57(2), 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01696-x

Milati, A., Baiduri, & Khusna, A. H. (2023). Kemampuan numerasi siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah kontekstual berdasarkan kecerdasan logis-matematis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(3), 2592–2604. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i3.7163

OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 results: Learning in the digital world, vol. I.

OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7f6d1f92-en

OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 results: Learning in the digital world, vol. I. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7f6d1f92-en

OECD. (2023c). PISA 2022 results (Vol. I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, Sari, N., Sagita, L., Siligar, E. I. P., & Sukma, Y. (2025). Learning numeracy using new Pempek mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i1.pp1-22

Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a One-Way Street: Bidirectional Relations Between Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge of Mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x

Rivai, A., Lestari, A., Munir, N. P., & Anas, A. (2024). Students’ Mathematical Literacy in Solving PISA Problems Observed by Learning Styles. Mathematics Education Journal, 17(1), 121–134.

Sangwin, C. J., & Jones, I. (2017). Asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9725-4

Sari, Y. M., Kohar, A. W., El Milla, Y. I., Fiangga, S., & Rahayu, D. S. (2024). Aligning numeracy task design with SDG goals: Nutrition facts as a context for prospective mathematics teachers’ problem posing. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp191-206

Sumliyah, I., Junaedi, I., & Mulyono. (2025). Mathematical literacy: A comparative analysis of school mathematics curricula in Indonesia, Singapore, and China. Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika), 7(1), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v7i1.488

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Weigand, H.-G., Trgalová, J., & Tabach, M. (2024). Mathematics teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital age. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56, 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01612-9

Zana, F. M., Sa’dijah, C., & Susiswo, S. (2022). LOTS to HOTS: How do mathematics teachers improve students’ higher-order thinking skills in the class? International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 5(3), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i3.143




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v14i4.14490

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.