MODEL PENGEMBANGAN DISPOSISI PRODUKTIF BERBASIS PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DENGAN MEDIATOR KELANCARAN PROCEDURAL, KOMPETENSI STRATEGIS, PENALARAN ADAPTIF
(1) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(2) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(3) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(4) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan model disposisi produktif berbasis pemahaman konseptual dengan melibatkan mediator kelancaran prosedural, kompetensi strategis, dan penalaran adaptif. Disposisi produktif dipandang sebagai hasil akhir yang mencerminkan sikap positif mahasiswa terhadap matematika, yang berakar dari penguasaan konsep dan keterampilan matematika lainnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian ekspos-fakto dengan analisis jalur untuk mengevaluasi hubungan langsung, tidak langsung, dan total antar variabel. Sampel terdiri dari 30 mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika dengan pemilihan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Instrumen penelitian berupa tes untuk mengukur pemahaman konseptual, kelancaran prosedural, kompetensi strategis, dan penalaran adaptif, serta kuesioner untuk disposisi produktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman konseptual berpengaruh signifikan terhadap disposisi produktif baik secara langsung maupun melalui kelancaran prosedural. Kompetensi strategis memberikan pengaruh total terbesar terhadap disposisi produktif dibandingkan mediator lainnya, meskipun tidak signifikan secara tidak langsung. Sebaliknya, penalaran adaptif tidak mendukung hubungan antar variabel secara signifikan. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya pendekatan pembelajaran yang holistik, dengan fokus pada pengembangan pemahaman konseptual, kelancaran prosedural, dan kompetensi strategis untuk membangun disposisi produktif yang positif.
This study aims to develop a productive disposition model based on conceptual understanding by involving mediators of procedural fluency, strategic competence, and adaptive reasoning. Productive disposition is seen as an end result that reflects students' positive attitude towards mathematics, which stems from mastery of concepts and other mathematical skills. This study used an expos-facto research design with path analysis to evaluate the direct, indirect, and total relationships between variables. The sample consisted of 30 students of Mathematics Education Department using purposive sampling technique. The research instruments were tests to measure conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, strategic competence, and adaptive reasoning, as well as a questionnaire for productive disposition. The results showed that conceptual understanding had a significant effect on productive disposition both directly and through procedural fluency. Strategic competence provided the largest total effect on productive disposition compared to other mediators, although it was not significant indirectly. In contrast, adaptive reasoning did not significantly support the relationship between variables. Overall, this study emphasizes the importance of a holistic learning approach, focusing on developing conceptual understanding, procedural fluency and strategic competence to build positive productive dispositions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Agsalon, J. C. D. (2023). Utilizing Lesson Study In Teaching Synthetic Division For Procedural Fluency In A Post-Pandemic Classroom. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p193-206
Altarawneh, A. F. (2021). Mathematical proficiency and preservice classroom teachers’ instructional performance. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.354.364
Awofala, A. O., Lawal, R. F., Arigbabu, A. A., & Fatade, A. O. (2022). Mathematics productive disposition as a correlate of senior secondary school students’ achievement in mathematics in Nigeria. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(6), 1326–1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1815881
Barham, A. I. (2020). Exploring in-service mathematics teachers’ perceived professional development needs related to the strands of mathematical proficiency (SMP). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8399
Darwani, D., Abidin, Z., & Hardisa, R. (2023). Description of Procedural Fluency and Productive Mathematical Disposition of Middle School Students. Al Khawarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 7(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.22373/jppm.v7i1.18877
Dorimana, A., Uworwabayeho, A., & Nizeyimana, G. (2022). Enhancing Upper Secondary Learners’ Problem-solving Abilities using Problem-based Learning in Mathematics. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(8), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.14
Duodu, S. B., John, E. H., Amoaddai, S., Gyamfi, M. A., & Ndamenenu, D. K. (2022). Colleges of Education Students’ Mathematics Proficiency: Assessing Strategic Competency and Adaptive Reasoning during Supported Teaching in Schools. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 11(3), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2022/v11/i3/mar22030
Elsayed, S. A. M. (2022). The Effectiveness of Learning Mathematics according to the STEM Approach in Developing the Mathematical Proficiency of Second Graders of the Intermediate School. Education Research International, 10(1), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5206476
El-shara, I. A. H., & Tabieh, A. A. S. (2025). The Effect of Using MatGPT on Mathematical Proficiency among Undergraduate Students. 15(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.4.2284
Fitria, A., & Mustika, D. (2024). Kemampuan Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Guru di Sekolah Dasar. Aulad: Journal on Early Childhood, 7(1), 43–52. https://aulad.org/aulad/article/view/582
Fitria, Y. (2022). Pembelajaran Yang Melejitkan Kecakapan Abad 21 Untuk Level Pendidikan Dasar Di Era 5.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar, 1(3), 367–387. https://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id/index.php/PSNPD/article/view/1083
Güner, P., & Gökçe, S. (2021). Linking critical thinking disposition, cognitive flexibility and achievement: Math anxiety’s mediating role. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(5), 458–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1975618
Hamid, H. (2020). Students’ mathematical proficiency in solving calculus problems after Maple implementation. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1613, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012025
Handayani, S., & Mustadi, A. (2023). Pengaruh Model Diskursis Multi Representasi Dengan Pendekatan CBSA Terhadap Kemampuan Kognitif Matematis Siswa Kelas VI. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 600. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.6275
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
Herlina, S., & Juandi, D. (2022). Systematics Literature Review: Pengembangan Mathematical Proficiency dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 2122–2133. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1417
Hsu, C. Y., Liang, J. C., Chuang, T. Y., & Chai, C. S. (2021). Probing in-service elementary school teachers’ perceptions of TPACK for games, attitudes towards games, and actual teaching usage: a study of their structural models and teaching experiences. Educational, 47(6), 734–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1729099
Husniah, L. S., & Arianto, F. (2021). Analyzing The Productive Disposition And Its Correlation With Mathematics Achievement Of Islamic Junior High School Students. Journal of Education and Practice, 12(10), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/12-10-16
Junpeng, P. (2020). Validation of a digital tool for diagnosing mathematical proficiency. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20503
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2002). Helping Children Learn Mathematics. In Helping Children Learn Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.17226/10434
Lemaire, P. (2017). Cognitive Development from a Strategy Perspective (1st ed.). Routledge.
Lomri, Y. A., & Dasari, D. (2024). The Correlation between Mathematical Disposition and Problem Solving in Junior High School Students. Mathema Journal E-Issn, 6(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.33365/jm.v6i1.3041
Mylopoulos, M., Steenhof, N., Kaushal, A., & Woods, N. (2018). Twelve tips for designing curricula that support the development of adaptive expertise. Medical Teacher, 40(8), 850–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484082
Ngu, B. H., & Phan, H. P. (2024). Instructional approach and acquisition of mathematical proficiency: Theoretical insights from learning by comparison and cognitive load theory. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 3(1), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263241266765
Nuraida, I. (2019). Realistic mathematics education with local instruction theory for enhancement students’ procedural fluency. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1280, Issue 4, p. 1280). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042003
Priyatna, S., & Marsigit, M. (2024). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Etnomatematika Keraton Yogyakarta Berorientasi Pada Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 458. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v13i2.8825
Qiang, R., Han, Q., Guo, Y., Bai, J., & Karwowski, M. (2020). Critical Thinking Disposition and Scientific Creativity: The Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.347
Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017). Developing Mathematics Knowledge. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12229
Roorda, G., de Vries, S., & Smale-Jacobse, A. E. (2024). Using lesson study to help mathematics teachers enhance students’ problem-solving skills with teaching through problem solving. Frontiers in Education, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1331674
Schulz, A. (2023). Assessing student teachers’ procedural fluency and strategic competence in operating and mathematizing with natural and rational numbers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(1), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09590-7
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (2020). Cognitive load theory and its implications for teaching and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-12033-001
Wang, Q., & Zhao, G. (2021). ICT self‐efficacy mediates most effects of university ICT support on preservice teachers’ TPACK: Evidence from three normal universities in China. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13141
Wilkerson, J. B. (2021). Cultivating a Productive-Disposition Toward Mathematics by Engaging in Service-Learning. Primus, 31(8), 869–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1776803
Zhang, Z. (2021). Language learners’ enjoyment and emotion regulation in online collaborative learning. System, 98(1), 102478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102478
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v14i1.11442
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
.png)

.png)