EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM POSING DAN PROBLEM SOLVING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DAN SELF-EFFICACY SISWA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v14i3.10964Keywords:
kemampuan pemecahan masalar, self-efficacy, problem posing, problem solvingAbstract
Rendahnya kemampuan siswa dalam memecahkan masalah akibat rasa percaya diri yang rendah memerlukan suatu model pembelajaran yang inovatif dalam penerapannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan model pembelajaran integrated problem posing and problem solving dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan self-efficacy siswa SMP. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah quasi eksperimen dengan non-equivalent pre-test and post-test group design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa yang belum pernah mempelajari mata pelajaran nilai perbandingan dan nilai invers di SMP Negeri 1 Cibingbin, Kuningan, Jawa Barat tahun pelajaran 2023/2024. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah cluster random sampling. Analisis data menggunakan statistik uji multivariat (Hotellings') diperoleh. Berdasarkan nilai effect size sebesar 0,10 menunjukkan keefektifan peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan self-efficacy akibat adanya model pembelajaran tersebut.
References
Abramovich, S. (2018). Integrating computers and problem posing in mathematics teacher education. In Integrating Computers and Problem Posing in Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1142/11089
Bandura, A. (2007). Much ado over a faulty conception of perceived self-efficacy grounded in faulty experimentation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.6.641
Baumanns, L., & Rott, B. (2022). Developing a framework for characterising problem-posing activities: a review. Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2021.1897036
Cifarelli, V. V., & Sevim, V. (2015). Problem posing as reformulation and sense-making within problem solving. In Mathematical Problem Posing: From Research to Effective Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_8
Feldon, D. F., Franco, J., Chao, J., Peugh, J., & Maahs-Fladung, C. (2018). Self-efficacy change associated with a cognitive load-based intervention in an undergraduate biology course. Learning and Instruction, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.007
Inoue, N., Asada, T., Maeda, N., & Nakamura, S. (2019). Deconstructing teacher expertise for inquiry-based teaching: Looking into consensus building pedagogy in Japanese classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.016
Kevin A. Artuz, J., & B. Roble, D. (2021). Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Mathematics Using Online-Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (O-POGIL). American Journal of Educational Research, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.12691/education-9-7-2
Kopparla, M., Bicer, A., Vela, K., Lee, Y., Bevan, D., Kwon, H., Caldwell, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2019). The effects of problem-posing intervention types on elementary students’ problem-solving. Educational Studies, 45(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509785
Likourezos, V., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2019). The Variability Effect: When Instructional Variability Is Advantageous. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09462-8
Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9
Polat, H., & Özkaya, M. (2023). The effect of problem posing-based active learning activities on problem-solving and posing performance: The case of fractions. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202317880
Polya, G. (1975). Polya: How to Solve it : a New Aspect of Mathematical Method. In Stochastic Optimization in Continuous Time.
Saygili, E. ; (2017). Examining the problem solving skills and the strategies used by high school students in solving non-routine problems. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 8(2).
Schindler, M., & Bakker, A. (2020). Affective field during collaborative problem posing and problem solving: a case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09973-0
Schoenfield, M. (2017). The Accuracy and Rationality of Imprecise Credences. Nous, 51(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12105
Utami, R. W., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dan self-efficacy siswa SMP negeri di Kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.14897
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Ten Steps to Complex Learning. In Ten Steps to Complex Learning. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315113210
Voica, C., Singer, F. M., & Stan, E. (2020). How are motivation and self-efficacy interacting in problem-solving and problem-posing? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10005-0
Yeh, Y. C., Chen, S. Y., Rega, E. M., & Lin, C. S. (2019). Mindful learning experience facilitates mastery experience through heightened flow and self-efficacy in game-based creativity learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JULY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01593
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
Creative Commons License
AKSIOMA:Â Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. AKSIOMA offers all authors of journal articles allows their research openly available, free access and time restrictions.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in AKSIOMA in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of AKSIOMA are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, AKSIOMA as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
