INVESTIGATING THE INDONESIAN EFL STUDENTS’ ARGUMENT IN ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY

Dedi Turmudi(1*),

(1) Universitas Negeri Malang Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


This study investigates the written test results of the Indonesian undergraduate students’ argumentative essay. For that reason, three research questions are made. 1). what is the level of achievement of the students in the argumentative essay quantitatively? 2). what aspects of an essay appear in respect to the argumentative essay generic structure as formulated? 3). how well did they use the rhetoric reputation and argument in their essay?. 27 handwriting' answer sheets of undergraduate English Department students enrolled at semester four of a state university in Indonesia were taken purposively. The data analysis uses a quantitative and qualitative approach. The results show that the students quantitatively achieved average score 76,74 which means good. All parts of generic structures were expressed in different quality. However; the organization of the essay is the lowest part compared to the other four parts respectively content, vocabulary, and language use seen from their segmented scores. This study is confirmed to be inline the previous study in that the majority of the students did not present the refutation section in both their English essays. This implies that teachers should be more aware of promoting this absent aspect as this refutation or rebuttal is a distinguishing marker in argumentative and discussion essays.


Keywords


Argumentative Essay; Argument; Generic Structure; Quality; Refutation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bailey, S. (2011). Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students, Third edition (3rd ed.). Routledge:Taylor & Francis e-Library. http://libgen.org/search?req=academic+writing+bailey&nametype=orig&column[]=title&column[]=author&column[]=series&column[]=periodical&column[]=publisher&column[]=year%5Cnpapers2://publication/uuid/424C3324-B527-4654-8B57-591F60B7C7C4

Elsawi, M., Ibrahim, E., Sid, N., Eljack, A., Bashir, I., & Elhassan, M. (2015). To What Extent Can Argumentative Essay Writing help develop Leaners ’ Critical Thinking. SUST Journal of Humanities, 16(4), 54–66.

Feliks,Tans;Liufeto,Gomer; M.Nalley, H. (2018). International Journal of English Language, Literature and Translation Studies (Ijelr). Narrative, 5(1), 99–111. http://www.ijelr.in/2.3.15/588-596 Dr. NENAVATH PADMAMMA.pdf

Hogue, A. (2008). First Steps in Academic Writing (2 nd). PEARSON Longman. http://www.amazon.com/dp/0132414880/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_ttl_encoding=UTF8&colid=34VCEHGG5K3UL&coliid=I184XMTXD9WLQU

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005

Johns, A. M. (2008). Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching, 41(02), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004892

Kamimura, T. (2000). Integration of process and product orientations in EFL writing instruction. RELC Journal, 31(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820003100201

Kim, M. S. (2006). Genre-Based Approach to Teaching Writing. TESOL Working Paper Series, 33–40. http://www.hpu.edu/CHSS/LangLing/TESOL/ProfessionalDevelopment/200680TWPfall06/07Kim_Genre.pdf

Lee, S. (2017). Writer Identity in Narrative and Argumentative Genres : A Case of Korean Students in the United States. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.1p.178

Lund, R. E. (2016). Handwriting as a tool for learning in ELT. ELT Journal, 70(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv048

Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. a, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/January 11, 2016

Myskow, G., & Gordon, K. (2010). A focus on purpose: using a genre approach in an EFL writing class. ELT Journal, 64(3), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp057

Oshima, Alice and Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing (3rd ed.). PEARSON Longman.

Park, G. (2013). Writing is a way of knowing’: Writing and identity. ELT Journal, 67(3), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct012

Pomeransky, A. A., & Khriplovich, I. B. (1999). Equations of motion of spinning relativistic particle in external fields. Surveys in High Energy Physics, 14(1–3), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01422419908228843

Rusfandi. (2015). Argument-Counterargument Structure in Indonesian EFL Learners English Argumentative Essays: A Dialogic Concept of Writing. RELC Journal, 46(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215587607

Schneer, D. (2014). Rethinking the Argumentative Essay. TESOL Journal, 5(4), 619–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.123

Silverstone, R. (1993). Vegetarianism — Food for the Future. Nutrition & Food Science, 93(6), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001008

Stab, C., & Gurevych, I. (2014). Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 46–56. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14-1006

Thwaites, P. (2014). Maximizing learning from written output. ELT Journal, 68(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct098

Trace, J., Janssen, G., & Meier, V. (2017). Measuring the impact of rater negotiation in writing performance assessment. Language Testing, 34(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215594830

Turmudi, D. (2017). Rethinking Academic Essay Writing : Selected Genres in Comparison. Premise Journal, 6(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v6i2.1052

Turmudi, D. (2020). English Scholarly Publishing Activities in the Industrial Revolution 4 . 0 : What , Why , and How ? ELTEJ, 3(1), 52–62.

http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/eltej/article/view/1890

Vinet, L., & Zhedanov, A. (2010). Education. In Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (4th ed., Vol. 44, Issue 8). Pearson Education, Inc. www.pearsonhigered.com

Zhang, D. (2009). Essay writing in a mandarin chinese webCT discussion board. Foreign Language Annals, 42(4), 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01051.x




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v9i2.3079

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics



=====================

Publisher

Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Unit Publikasi Ilmiah ( Scientific Publication Unit)

Address:

Gedung HI Lt 1, Ruang UPT Publikasi Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara No.116, Iringmulyo, Metro Timur, Kota Metro, Lampung 34111
Phone/WA: +6285709141060

Email:upi@ummetro.ac.id 

======================

e-ISSN-2442-482x  p-ISSN-2089-3355

Download Premise Official Template  June -October 2022

Certificate