DEVELOPMENT OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT MODES BY QUIDED-INQUIRY BASED TO FOSTER SELF-REGULATION OF STUDENT’ HIGH SCHOOL

asih sulistia ningrum, Chandra Ertikanto, Undang Rosidin

Abstract


The purpose of this research to produce a product of formative assessment model by guided-inquiry based to foster self-regulation of student in physics learning of high school, produce special are: characteristic formative assessment model, practically, benefit, and effectiveness formative assessment model guided-inquiry based to foster self-regulation student’ learning high school in development. The research is a research and development (R&D). Design development use a one-shot case study design. Subject trials is a physics teacher and student in high school. Data collection techniques such as questionnaires and assessment instruments. The results of the formative assessment model guided-inquiry based developement have characteristics of a set of assessments consisting of assessment scenarios, pretest-posttest, self-assessment & peer-assessment sheets and scoring guidelines. The results of the practicality and benefit test show that the formative assessment model is a very practical with amount 91% and very effective with amount 95% for use during physics learning. Furthermore, the results its effectiveness test show that are implementation of a formative assessment model guided-inquiry based is highly effective (n-gain = 0.75) used during physics learning.

Keywords: Formative Assessment Model, Guided-Inquiry, Self-Regulation.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdelraheem, A., & Asan, A. 2006. Thhe Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Technology Enahanced Collaborative Learning Environment. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning. 2(2): 65-87.

Alfiana, A. D. 2013. Regulasi Diri Mahasiswa Ditinjau dari Keikutsertaan dalam Organisasi Kemahasiswaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan. 1 (2): 245-259.

Alonso-Tapia, J., & Panadero, E. 2010. Effect of Self-Assessment Scrips on Self-Regulation and Learning. The Spaniish Journal of Psychology. 33(3): 232-397.

Ayu, N. M., Rosidin, U., & Viyanti. 2014 Pengembangan Instrumen Penialian Keterampilan Metakognisi pada Pembelajaran IPA di SMP. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika. 2(5): 135-146.

Baleni, Zwelijongile Gaylard. 2015. Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Its Pros and Cons. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 13(4):228-236.

Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. NY: Freeman.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. 2009. Developing the Theory of Formative Assesment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 21(1): 5-31.

Bridgett, D. J., Oddi, K. B., Laake, L. M., Murdock, K. M., & Bachmann, M. N. 2013. Integrating and Differentiating Aspects of Self-Regulation: Effortful Control, Executive Functioning, and Links to Negative Affectivity. Emotion. 13 (1): 47-63.

Boekaerts, M. 2011. Emotions, Emotion Regulation, and Self-Regulation of Learning. In B. J. Zimmerman. & D. H Schunk (Eds). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning anf Performance. pp. 408-482.

Borg, W. R. Gall, M. D., & Gall, J. P., 2003. Educational Research: An Introduction (Seventh Edition ed.). United States: Pearson Education, Inc.

Clark, I. 2015. Formative Assessment: Translating High-Level Curriculum Principles Into Classroom Practice. The Curriculum Journal. 26 (1): 91-114.

Clark, I. 2012. Formative Assessment: Assessment is for Self-Regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review. doi: 10,1007/s10648-011-9191-6.

Chodijah, S., Fauzi, A., & Wulan, R. 2012. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Guided Inquiry yang Dilengkapi Penilaian Portofolio pada Materi Gerak Melingkar. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika. 1(1): 1-19.

Coladarci, T & Cobb, C, D. 2013. Fundamentals of Statistical Reasoning in Education. America: WILEY.

Crossouard, B. 2011. Using Formative Assessment to Support Complex Learning in Conditions of Social Adversity. Assessment in Education. 81(1): 59-72.

Damayanti, Dyah, S., Ngazizah, Nur., & K, Setyadi, E. 2013. Pengembangan LKS dengan Pendekatan Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Mengoptimalkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Peserta Didik pada Materi Listrik Dinamis SMAN 3 Purworejo Kelas X TP. 2012/2013. Radiasi. 3 (1): 58-62.

Dignath, C., Buttner, G., & Langfeldt, H. 2008. How Cann Primary hool Students Learn Self-Regulated Learning Strategies Most Effectively! A Meta-Analysis on Self-Regulation Training Programs. Educational Research Review. 3(2): 101-129.

Evriani., Kurniawan, Y., & Muliyanti, R. 2017. Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Terpadu Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Qiuded Inquiry dengan Strategi SGRS. JPF Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro. 5(2): 119-125.

Furtak, E, M. 2012. Linking a Learning Progression for Natural Selection to Teachers’ Enactment of Formative Assessment. Journal Of Research In Sciencce Teachin. 49 (9). 1181-1210.

Furtak, E. M., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. 2008. Making Student’ Thingking Expliicit in Writing and Discussion: An Analysis of Formative Assessment Propts. Science Education. pp. 799-823.

Hall, K., & Burke, W. M. 2004. Making Formative Assessment Work. London: McGraw Hill-Education.

Hanson, D. M. 2007. Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities (Online). (http://quarknet.fnal.gov/fellows/TLDownloads/Designing_POGIL_ Activities.pdf).

Hake, R. R. 2003. Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: a Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics. 66 (1): 64-74.

Hidayat, A, F. 2013. Hubungan Regulasi Diri Dengan Presentasi Belajar Kalkulus II Ditinjau Dari Aspek Metakognisi, Motivasi, Dan Perilaku. Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako. 1 (1): 1-8.

Kostons, D., Gog, T. V., & Paas, F. 2011. Trainig Self-Assessment and Task-Selection Skills: A Cognitive Approach to Improving Self-Regulated Learning. Learning and Instruction. 30: 1-12.

Kusairi, S. 2012. Analisis Asesmen Formatif Fisika SMA Berbantuan Komputer. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. 48(1) 69-87.

Mansyur., Rasyid, H., & Suratno. 2015. Asesmen Pembelajaran Di Sekolah. Pustaka Belajar: Yogyakarta.

McManus, s. 2008. Attibutes of Effective Formative Assessment. Paper Prepared for the Formative Assessment for Teachers and Students (FAST). State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards (SCASS) of the CCSSO (The Council of Chief State School Officer). Department of Public Instruction.

Moon, T. R., Brighton, C. M., & Callahan. C. M. 2005. Development of Authentic Assessment for the Middle School Classroom. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education. 16(2/3): 119-133.

Muntasyir, S., Budiyono., & Usodo, B. 2014. Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT dengan Assessment For Learning (Afl) Melalui Penilaian Teman Sejawat pada Materi Persamaan Garis Ditinjau dari Kreativitas Belajar Matematika Siswa MTsN Di Kabupaten Sragen. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika. 2 (7): 667-679.

Nahadi., Firman, H., & Farina, J. 2015. Effect of Feedback in Formative Assessment in the Student Learning Activities on Chemical Courese to the Formation of Habits of Mind. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 4(1): 36-42.

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlance-Dick, D. 2006. Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice. Studies in Higher Education. 31(2): 263-275.

Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. 2012. Rubrics and Self-Assessment Scripts Effects on Self-Regulation, Learning and Self-Efficacy in Secondary Education. Learning and Individual Differences. 22: 806-813.

Pribadi, B. I. 2011. Model ASSURE untuk Mendesain Pembelajaran Sukses. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.

Puntrich, P, R. 2000. Multiple goals, Multiple Pathways: The Role of Goal Orientation in Learning and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92: 544-555.

Putney, L. G., & Broughton, S. H. 2011. Developing Collective Classroom Efficacy Community Organizer. Journal of Teacher Education. 62(1): 93-105.

Rahmawati, I. L., Hartono., & Nugroho, S, E. 2015. Pengembangan Asesmen Formatif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Self Regulation Siswa pada Tema Suhu dan Perubahannya. Unnes Science Education Journal. 4(2): 842-850.

Sadler, D. R. 1989. FormativeAssessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Sciences. 18(2): 119-144.

Sagap., Husain, S, N., & Djirimu, M. 2014. Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Biologi Menggunakan Pilihan Ganda Beralasan dalam Materi Pokok Sel Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Dampal Selatan. Jurnal e-Jipbiol. 2 (3): 1-8.

Saptono, S., Rustaman, N. Y., Saefudin., & Widodo, A. 2013. Model Integrasi Atribut Asesmen Formatif (IAAF) dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Sel untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Penalaran dan Berfikir Analitik mahasiswa Calon guru. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2(1): 31-40.

Schunk, Dale H.2012. Learning Theories: an Educational Perspective. Pearson: New York.

Shofiyah, H & Wasis. 2013. Penerapan Self-Assessment (Penilaian Diri) pada Kegiatan Praktikum untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMAN 1 SIDAYU. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika. 2 (3): 139-142.

Siswianingsih, W., Dwiyanti, G., & Gumelar, C. 2013. Penerapan Peer Assessment dan Self Assessment pada Tes Formatif Hidrokarbon untuk Feedback Siswa SMA Kelas X. Jurnal pendidikan MIPA. 18 (1): 107-115.

Sulistijo, S. H., Sukarmin., & Sunarno, W. 2017. Physich Learning Using Inquiry-Student Team Achievement Division (ISTAD) and Guided Inquiry Models Vieweb by Students Achievement Motivation. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 6(1): 130-137.

Torrance, H. & Pryor, J. 2002. Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching, Learning and Assessment in the Classroom. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Townshend, J., Moons, L., & Skov, P. 2005. Denmark: Building on a Tradition of Democracy and dialogue in Schools. In Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development. Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms. pp. 117-128.

Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & egers, M. 2010. Factors Affecting Students Self-Efficacy in Higher Education. Educational Research Riview. 6(2): 95-108.

Vlassi, M., & Karaliota, A. 2012. The Comparison Between Guided Inquiry and Traditional Teaching Methode. A Case Study for the Teaching of the Structure of Matter to 8th Grade Greeksstudents. Procedia-Social and Behabivioral Science. pp. 494-497.

Voogt, J., & Kasurien, H. 2005. Finland: Emphasising Development Instead of Competition and Comparison. In Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development. Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms. pp. 149-162.

Winne, P, H. 2001. Self-Regulated Learning Viewed from Models of Information Processing. In B. J. Zimmerman. & D. H Schunk (Eds). Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. pp. 153-189.

Winne, P, H., & Hadwin, A. P. 1998. Studying as Self-Regulated Learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesses (Eds). Metacognition in Education and Practice. The Educational Psychology, 34: 1-8.

Zimmerman, B, J. 2013. From Cognitive Modeling to Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Career Path. Educcational Psychologist. 48 (3): 135-147.

Zimmerman, B. J. 1990. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: an Overview. Educational Psychologist. 25: 3-17.

Zimmerman, B. J. 2011. Motivational Sources and Outcomes of Self-Regulated Learning and Performance. In B. J. Zimmerman. & D. H Schunk (Eds). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning anf Performance. pp. 49-64.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. L. 2011. Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning anf Performance. New York: Routledge.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v6i1.1276

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexing by:

                                   

 

   


View JPF Stats

 

 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika by Prodi Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

 

Flag Counter