Aulia Hanifah Qomar


The objective of the research are: (1) to identify weather and to what extend the use of internet-based materials increase students’ skill in developing ideas to write descriptive text; and (2) to describe the strengths and the weaknesses of internet-based materials in this research. The Classroom Action Research which was carried out at Muhammadiyah University of Metro for the third semester in the academic year of 2012/2013. In collecting the data, she used interviews, observations, questionnaires, diaries, documents, and tests. The data were analyzed through Constant Comparative Method and descriptive statistics. The research findings showed that internet-based materials can increase students’ writing skill in developing ideas to write descriptive text. The increase in students’ writing skill includes: 1) The number of appropriate paragraphs in describing something is all describing the topic. 2) The number of appropriate sentences in describing something was all representing main idea in the paragraphs. 3) Students had knowledge able substantive, development of thesis topic relevant to assign topic. 4) Students were fluent expression, ideas clearly stated / support, well organized, logical sequencing, cohesive and correct the generic structure of descriptive text such as identification and description. 5) Students were sophisticated range, effective word or diction choice and usage word from mastery, appropriate register. 6) Students have effective complex construction, few errors of agreement, tense number, word order/function, articles, pronoun, and preposition. 7) Students were demonstrated mastery of conventions, few errors spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing. The final result of the tests showed that their score were increasing in the mean score; from 69 (pre test) to 73 (test in cycle 1), 79 (test in cycle 2), and 81 (in cycle 3). It was above the minimum standard of the school (72). Related to the strengths of internet-based materials, includes: 1) Teaching and learning were more effective; 2) The students were interested in the lesson especially in writing; 3) The students’ writing ideas were well developed; 4) The students did the task given by the lecturer; 5) The students’ knowledge was improved. The weaknesses of internet-based materials includes: 1) The students were not controlled when they used internet; 2) The students frequently opened another sites for teaching and learning process; 3) Students needed a long time to access the materials from the internet; 4) The time management related to the classroom situation; 5) Teaching and learning process became crowded.


Writing, Developing Ideas, Internet-based Materials, Strength and Weaknesses of Internet-based Materials

Full Text:



Anderson, M., Anderson, K,. 1997. Text Types in English1 & 2. Macmillan Education.

Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. New York. Longman.

Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. 2007. How to Teach English with Technology. England. Longman.

Faisal. 2010. The Effectiveness of Internet-based Materials to Teach Writing Viewed from Students’ Creativity , An Experimental Research in the Semester Four Students of the English Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Muhammadiyah University of Purwokerto, in the Academic Year of 2009/2010

Harris, J. 1993. Introducing Writing. England. Penguin Group.

Hernowo. 2003. Quantum Writing. Bandung. Mizan Learning Center.

Hikmah, Baiq. 2011. Improving Students’ Writing Skill Using Email, A Classroom Action Research in the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Negeri 2 Selong in the Academic Year of 2010/2011

Hornby, AS. 2002. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford University Press; New York. accessed: June 20, 2012 /acadwrite/ descriptive html accessed: June 20, 2012 http: //leostcloudstate. edu/acadwrite /descriptive.html accessed: June 20, 2012

Kasanga, L. A. 1996. Peer Interaction and SecondLanguage Learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52 (4), 611-639

Madsen, Harold, S. 1983. Technique in Testing. New York. Oxford University Press.

Maurer, M. M. & Davidson, S. G. 1998. Leadership in Instructional Technology. NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.

M. Reid. Joy. 1994. The process of Paragraph Writing, Second Edition. Prentice Hall Regents. New Jersey

Nicholas, H. 1982. A History of Foreign Word in English. 48 Grovesnor Street. London.

Nisa Aulia Azam. 2011. Utilizing Students’ Blog to Improve Writing Skill (An Action Research at 8th Grade of SMP Negeri Wonogiri in the Academic Year of 2010/2011). Surakarta.

Schampfer Azar, Betty. 1992. Fundamentals of English Grammar. Regents/ Prentice hail; New Jersey.

Qiubai, Qin. 2000. Genre Analysis and Its Implication for EFL Teaching. Lecture Notes of Summer School for Foreign Language Teacher in China, Hangzou. Zhejiang.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Aulia Hanifah Qomar

Flag Counter

Start counter 

DOAJ , IPI  , Portal Garuda, SINTA, University Library, Google Scholar