THE COMPARISON OF READING COMPREHENSION TAUGHT BY USING STAD AND JIGSAW TECHNIQUE AT DIFFERENT MOTIVATION TO READ AT THE EVEN SEMESTER OF ELEVENTH GRADES IN SMAN 1 RUMBIA ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013

Eko Mulyono, Bambang Eko Siagianto

Abstract


Reading is necessary when students further their study, especially at Senior High School level. Based on the Pre survey, Many students are not interested in reading subject, the students are not interested in teaching technique which is used by the teacher, the students motivation to read are still low, the quality of their reading comprehension are still low. There are two techniques presented as a solution in this research. They are STAD Technique and Jigsaw technique. The objective of this research is to know whether there is any difference of reading comprehension taught by using STAD and Jigsaw technique,to unlock whether there is any difference of reading comprehension taught by  using STAD and Jigsaw technique at high and low motivation to read, and to explore whether there is any interaction of reading comprehension, learning technique, and different motivation to read at the even semester of eleventh grades in SMA N 1 Rumbia academic year 2012/2013.

The method of investigation is held through quantitative research. The researcher uses true experimental research. In this experiment, the researcher applies factorial  design. The research is conducted at the eleventh grades of SMA N 1 Rumbia in academic year 2012/2013. The population in this research is 204 students. It consisted 6 classes and each class consist 34 students. The researcher takes 68 students from total population as the sample, 31 students as experiment class and 31 as control class that match based on classification of student level. The researcher uses cluster random sampling as technique sampling.

To analyze data, the researcher uses ANOVA TWO WAYS formula. The researcher got the result of Fhit is 18, 2 and Ftable  is 7, 14. It means that Fhit > Ftable. And the criterion of Ftest is Ha accepted if Fhit  > Ftable. So, there is any difference result of  Reading comprehension taught by using STAD and Jigsaw and STAD technique is more effective technique than Jigsaw technique toward students Reading comprehension at different motivation to read at the eleventh grades of SMA N 1 Rumbia academic year 2012/2013. The researcher expects English teacher use STAD Technique in reading, so the students feel fun and enjoy in following the learning process.

 


Keywords


Jigsaw, Motivation to Read, Reading Comprehension, STAD

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad Jazim. (2010). Statistik Lanjutan. Metro: Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1996). Prosedur Penelitian: suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta

Artz, A. F., & Newman, C. M. (1990). Cooperative learning. Mathematics Teacher, 83, 448-449.

Brophy, Jere (1998). Motivating Students to Learn. State University: Michigan.

Brown, H Douglas (2001). Teaching by Principles. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc: San Francisco.

Brown H. Douglas. (2000). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. California: San Francisco State University.

David C. McClelland, et.al (1976). The Achievement Motive; New York: irvington.

Elliot, Et al (2000). Educational Psychology: Effective Teaching, Effective Learning. McGraw­Hill Companies Inc: USA.

Harmer, Jeremy. (1985). The Practice of English Language Testing

_______. 2002. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

_______. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: Bina Aksara

Retrieved wikipedia 2008

Hornby.AS. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

Irianto, Agus (2004). Stastitik: Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Kencana: Jakarta.

Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative and individualistic learning. (3 rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Karwono,(1991). Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Teori dan Penelitian: IKIP Malang.

Karwono, Heni Mularsih. (2010). Belajar dan Pembelajaran serta Pemanfaatan Sumber Belajar. Jakarta: Cerdas Jaya

Kessler, C (1992). Cooperative language learning: A teacher resource book. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. M.A. Dissertation, Mahidol University.

Koindrasari, Etri. (2012). The Comparison of Jigsaw and STAD Cooperative Technique toward Simple Present Tense Mastery at the Eight Level in SMP N 3 Batanghari Nuban Academic Year 2011/2012. Published University of Muhammadiyah Metro. Metro

Metzke, L., & Berghoff, P. (1999). Cooperative learning in the classroom. In A. S. Canter & S. A. Carroll (Eds.), Helping children at home and school: Handouts from your school psychologist (pp. 147-150). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

M. Richard and Porter, W. lyman (1991). Motivation and work Behavior. Mc Graw­Hill Book: Singapure.

Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classrooms. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Nunan, David1 (1991). Language Teaching Methodology. New York: Prentice hall.

Nuttall, Christine (1996). Teaching Reading Skills: in a Foreign Language. Reed Educational and Professional Publishing: Jordan Hill.

Patel.M.F, et.al (2008). English language Teaching(methods, tools & techniques). Vaishali Nagar: Jaipur.

Prasetyo, Eko. (2012). The Comparison between Reading Ability in Narrative Text Using STAD and CBI Methods at the Tenth Level at the Senior High School Muhammadiyah 1 Metro 2011/2012. Published University of Muhammadiyah Metro. Metro

Retrived from http://www.allaboutlearningpress.com/motivation-to-read, accessed on tuesday, 5th February, 2013

Retrived from http://pustakabakul.blogspot.com/2012/02/essence-of-reading.html

Stahl, S.A (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221-234.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Slavin, E. Robert (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Needham Heights Steers: Massachusetts.

Uno, B Hamzah. (2007). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Analisis dibidang pendidikan. Jakarta : Pt Bumi Aksara




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v2i1.1090

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Eko Mulyono, Bambang Eko Siagianto

Flag Counter
Indexing:

Start counter 

DOAJ , IPI  , Portal Garuda, SINTA, University Library, Google Scholar