Treatment for Disruption of Smartphone Use in Learning Activity Through School-Wide Positive Behavior Support

Arina Mufrihah(1*)

(1) STKIP PGRI Sumenep
(*) Corresponding Author




This study is purposed for guiding students to use their smartphone appropriately and opportunely through School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPB). Location of this research was at SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Yogyakarta which used Classroom Action Research and Spiral Self-Reflective as its design. The research process was undertaken within 2 cycles where each cycle consists of the planning phase, action phase, and reflection phase. Group counseling and individual counseling were applied as the form of SWPB in which students who received these services were selected purposively. All data collected through observation, questionnaire, and interview. Respondents participated cooperatively during counseling service sessions; as a result, they can manage their selves to not use smartphone unless it is necessary for learning resource and assignment in the classroom.


group counseling; individual counseling; school-wide positive behavior; usage of smartphone


Bliese, J. 2013. The Effects of School-Wide Positive Behavior Supports. Dissertation. Baker University: Graduate Department and Faculty of The School of Education.

Bradshaw, C., Debnam K., Koth, C., & Leaf, P. 2009. Preleminery Validation of The Implementation Phases Inventory for Assessing Fidelity of School-Wide Positive Behavior Supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 11(3), p. 145-160.

Bradshaw, C., Koth, T., & Leaf. 2009. Altering School Climate Through School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Findings from a Group-Randomized Effectiveness Trial. Prevention Science. Vol.10, p.100-115.

Bradshaw, C., Mitchell, M., & Leaf, P. 2010. Examining the Effects of School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on Student Outcomes: Results from a Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial in Elementary Schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. Vol. 12, No. 3, p.133-148.

McIntosh, K., Flannery, K. B., Sugai, Ge., Braun, D., & Cochrane, K. 2008. Relathionships Between Academics and Problem Behavior in the Transition From Middle School to High School. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. DOI: 10.1177/1098300708318961.

Bromley, K. 2012. Using Smartphones to Suplement Classroom Reading. The Reading Teacher. Vol. 66(4), p.340-344. DOI: 10.1002/TRTR.01130.

Coffey, J.H., & Horner, R.H. 2012. The Sustainability of Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports. Exceptional Children. Vol 78, No. 4, p.407-422. DOI: 10.1177/001440291207800402.

Gage, N. A., Sugai, G., Lewis, T.J., & Brzozowy, S. 2013. Academic Achievement and School-Wide Positive Behavior Supports. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. DOI: 10.1177/1044207313505647.

Horner, R.H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C.M. 2010. Examining the Evidence Base for School-Wide Positive Behavior Support. Focus on Exceptional Children. ISSN. 0015-511X. Vol. 42, Number 8, p.2-16.

Hur, J.W., & Oh, J. 2012. Learning, Engagement, and Technology: Middle School Students’ Three-Year Expereince in Pervasive Technology Environments in South Korea. Journal of Educational Computing Research. Vol. 46, No. 3, p.295-312.

Jovilette, K., et al. 2014. School-Wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports in Residental School for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorder: First Years of Implementation and Maintenance Follow-Up Focus Groups. Residental Treatment for Children & Youth. Vol. 31(1), p.63-79. DOI: 10.1080/0886571X.20.

Lee, E.B. 2014. Facebook Use and Texting Among African American and Hispanic Teenagers: An Implication for Academic Performance. Journal of Black Studies. DOI: 10.1177/0021934713519819.

Mc.Intosh, K., Bennet, J.L., & Price, K. 2011. Evaluation of Social and Academic Effects of School-Wide Positive Behavior Support in a Canadian School District. Exceptional Education International. ISSN. 1918-5227. Vol. 21(1), p.46-60.

Miranda, T., et al. 2011. Reluctant Readers in Middle School: Successful Engagement With Text Using the E-Reader. International Journal of Applied Science amd Technology. Vol. 1, No. 6, p.81-89.

Nelson, J.R., Hurley, K., Synhorst, L., & Epstein, M. 2008. The Nebraska Three-Tiered Behavioral Prevention Model Case Study. School-wide Prevention Models: Lesson Learned in Elementary School. New York; Guilford.

O’Bannon, B., & Thomas, K. 2014. Teacher Perceptions of Using Mobile Phones in the Classroom: Age Matters!. Computers & Education. Vol 45, p.15-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.006.

Sailor, W., Dunlap, G., Sugai, G & Horner, R. 2009. Handbook of Positive Behavior Supports. New York: Springer.

Tillmann, N., et al. 2012. The Future of Teaching Programming is on Mobile Devices. ITiCSE ’12 Proceeding of the 17th ACM Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ISBN: 978-1-4503-1246-2, p.156-161. DOI: 10.1145.2325296.2325336.

West, D.M. 2013. Mobile Learning: Transforming Education, Engaging Students. and Improving Outcomes. Center for Technology Innovation. September, p.1-17.

Arina Mufrihah


298 Views, 220 Download Vol 7, No 1 (2017) Section: ARTICLES Submitted: 2017-01-05 Published: 2017-06-30