MENUMBUHKEMBANGKAN KESADARAN DAN KETERAMPILAN METAKOGNISI MAHASISWA JURUSAN BIOLOGI MELALUI PENERAPAN STRATEGI PBL DAN KOOPERATIF GI

Muhammad Danial

Abstract


The teaching of the educational levels including at the university level is still emphasized on the aspect of cognitive ability. The emphasis on the aspect of empowering the metacognitive is not touched yet. As a matter of fact, there are some techniques of teaching that can be applied to empower their metacognitive ability such Problem-based Learning (PBL) and cooperative Group Investigation (GI) strategy applies. This study aims to explain the effect of PBL and cooperative GI strategy to the metacognition and this study use “Pretest-Posttest Nonequivalent Control Group Design”. This study indicates that students that learned with PBL and GI strategy have scores of metacognition from pretest to posttest higher than students that learned with conventional strategy. Based on the ANACOVA test showed that there were significance differences of students’ metacognition ability between the students who were thought through PBL strategy and the students who were thought through conventional and GI strategy.

 

Kata kunci: PBL, kooperatif GI, metakognisi


Full Text:

PDF

References


Achmad, T.H. 2004. Developing Metacognitive Interaction between Tutor and Student in PBL-tutorial. Bandung: Medical Education Research and Development Unit (MERDU) School of Medicine,Universitas Padjajaran, (Online),http://www.google.co.id/search?hl=id&q=PBL+Metacognitive&btnG=Telusuri&meta=&aq=f&oq, diakses 21 Pebruari 2010).

Anderson, L.R., & Krathwohl, D.R. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. A Bridged Edition. New York: Addision Wesley Longman, Inc.

Arends, R.I. 2007. Learning to Teach ( Seventh Edition). New York: McGraw Hill Co.Inc.

Bahri, A. 2010. Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran RQA pada Perkuliahan Fisiologi Hewan terhadap Kemampuan Metakognitif, Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Mahasiswa Jurusan Biologi Fmipa Universitas Negeri Makassar. Tesis. Malang: UM Malang.

Cetinkaya, P., & Erktin, E. 2002. Assessment of Metacognition and to Relationship with Reading Comprehension, Achievement, and aptitude, (Online), (http://buje.boun.edu.tr/en/images/stories/Vol119issue1/edjournal_19_Cetinkaya.pdf, diakses 30 Maret 2010).

Corebima, A.D. 2008. Rubrik Keterampilan Metakognisi yang Terintegrasi dengan Tes Essay, Rubrik MAD, Malang.

Corebima, A.D. 2009. Jadikan Peserta Didik Pebelajar Mandiri. Makalah Disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, Himpunan Mahasiswa Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UNM, Makassar, 19 Desember.

Corliss, S.B. 2005. The Effect of Relative Prompts and Collaborative Learning in Hypermedia Problem-based Learning Environments on Problem Solving and Metacognitive Skills. Dissertation, Austin: The University of Texas.

De Grave, W.S., Boshuizen, H.P.A, & Schmidt, H.G. 1996. Problem Based- Learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Journal Instructional Science. Springer Netherlands, (Online), Volume 24 Number 5 September 1996:321-341.

(http://www.springerlink.com/content/n53038j64l575155/, diakses 21 Pebruari 2010).

Downing, K., Kwong,T. , Chan, S.W., Lam, T.F., & Downing, W.K. 2009. Problem-Based Learning and the Development of Metacognition. Journal Higher Education. Volume 57, (Online), Number 5/May, 2009:609-621. (http://www.springerlink.com/content/k8n881w884258jvp/, diakses 21 Pebruari 2010).

Flavell, J.H. 1979. Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A new area of psychological inquiry. American Psychologist, 34:906-911.

Huthala & Jack, 1994. Group Investigation: Structuring an Inquiry-Based Curriculum. American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA: Speeches/Conference Papers. Diakses 9 September 2008.

Schraw, G. & Dennison, R.S. 1994. Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19, 460-475.

Silver, C.E.H., Ellina, C., & Maria C.D. 2004. Psychological Tools in Problem-based Learning. Enhancing Thinking through Problem-based Learning Approaches: International Perspectives. Singapore: Thomson Learning.

Slavin, R.E. 2006. Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

Tsoi, M.F.; Ngoh, K.G; & Lian, S.C. 2004. Using Group Investigation for Chemistry in Teacher Education. Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, (Online), Vol. 5, issue 1 Article 6, (http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v5_issue_1/tsoimf/index.htm-content, diakses 19 Pebruari 2008).

Tuckman, B.W., 1999. Conducting Educational Research. (5th ed). New York: Hartcourt Brace College Publisher.

Universitas Negeri Malang, 2007. Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (Edisi keempat). Malang: BAAPSI-Penerbit UM.

Wiersma, W. 1995. Research Methods in Education (An Introduction Sixth Editon). Massachusetts USA: Allyn and Bacon.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/bioedukasi.v1i2.188

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 

Bioedukasi : e-ISSN (2442-9805), p-ISSN (2086-4701)

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara, Kota Metro, Lampung, Indonesia 

(Phone1) +6285292078488 (Email1) bioedukasi.ummetro@gmail.com
(Phone2) +6281272920110

 Bio Statistik  

Web
Analytics VIEW MY STATE (Pengunjung Kami)

Lisensi Creative Commons

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.

Flag Counter